corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 12331

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Taylor L.
Pharma industry must change R&D model, says Tufts director
PharmaTimes 2008 Jan 7
http://www.pharmatimes.com/clinicalnews/article.aspx?id=12567&src=EWorldNews


Full text:

Pharmaceutical companies must change the way they conduct R&D if they are to ride out pressures to develop new prescription medicines more swiftly and at lower cost, warns the director of the US Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development.

“The pharmaceutical industry essentially has not changed its R&D paradigm in more than four decades, while nearly every other global industry has undergone major change within the last decade,” said Kenneth Kaitin as the Tufts Center prepared to launch its Outlook 2008 report on near-term pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical trends. “The drug industry has little choice than to change the way it does business,” he added.

In the near- and medium-term, Kaitin suggested, the most successful drug developers would be those that “evolve their management and information systems to improve access to new development platforms and tools”. Longer-term winners would be companies that radically overhauled their approach to business, all the way from R&D to project management, manufacturing and marketing.

Among the Tufts report’s near-term predictions are that drug sponsors will pay more attention to simplifying and streamlining clinical study protocols in order to reduce delays and improve adherence and performance at investigative sites. The Tufts Center also believes US policymakers will increasingly look to post-marketing studies that assess comparable clinical- and cost-effectiveness when they make decisions on prescribing guidelines and drug reimbursement.

Other near-term trends cited in the report include:

• Companies will continue to step up investment in developing personalised drugs and biologics, which will increase the attractiveness of diagnostics players as potential partners and takeover targets.
• The US Food and Drug Administration will be challenged to implement the FDA Amendments Act of 2007 – signed into law by President Bush last September – in the wake of large staff turnovers, under a new administration, and in the face of a “vigilant and concerned” general public and Congress.
• Interest in commercial cancer vaccine development will wane in the short term as more targeted cancer therapeutics, such as monoclonal antibodies and protein kinase inhibitors, reach the market.
• The FDA and the European Medicines Agency will continue their efforts to harmonise regulatory approaches in areas of common interest, such as pandemic vaccines, medicines for children, rare diseases and cancer.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909