corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 12262

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Rubin R.
Year in Health: Here's to your safety
USA Today 2007 Dec 23
http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2007-12-23-yearend-diabetes_N.htm?POE=click-refer


Full text:

Persistent questions about the safety of both prescription and over-the-counter drugs, a menacing microbe spreading throughout the U.S. and a globe-trotting TB patient garnered headlines this past year. A look back at the top health stories of 2007:
Avandia gets ‘black box’ treatment

Yet another blockbuster drug lost some of its luster in 2007. But unlike Vioxx, the arthritis drug pulled off the market in 2004 because of safety concerns, Avandia is still around.

Steven Nissen, chief of cardiovascular medicine at the Cleveland Clinic, got everyone’s attention in May when he reported that diabetics who took Avandia were 43% more likely to have a heart attack or be hospitalized for blocked coronary arteries than other patients in clinical trials.

In July, a Food and Drug Administration advisory panel voted 20-3 that Avandia, used to treat type 2 diabetes, increases heart risks. But they voted 22-1 that its risk/benefit profile merits it staying on drugstore shelves. Maker GlaxoSmithKline says Avandia sales have fallen since Nissen’s findings appeared in The New England Journal of Medicine.

It’s long been known that Avandia and Actos, the other drug in its class, raise the risk of congestive heart failure. In August, the FDA announced a stronger warning, a “black box,” on both drugs’ labels against their use in patients with advanced congestive heart failure.

Based on Nissen’s study and others, the FDA added information to Avandia’s black box last month about a potential increased heart attack risk. The FDA has asked Glaxo to compare Avandia’s heart attack risk with that of other diabetes pills, but you won’t be reading about those findings until 2014.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909