corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 1221

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Drack G, Kuhn HP, Haller U; Committee for Quality Preservation of the Swiss Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.
[Is continuing medical education under suspicion of corruption? Contribution to the discussion by the Committee for Quality Preservation of the Swiss Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics]
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch 2003 Apr; 43:(2):111-7
http://content.karger.com/produktedb/produkte.asp?typ=fulltext&file=GGR43111


Abstract:

The requirements laid down by law and by the medical profession itself with regard to continuing medical education have recently been tightened. The cost of good training is high, both in time and money. Sponsoring, especially by the pharmaceutical industry, has helped to keep costs down for individual participants. The question of a tariff system for the payment of compulsory training is now being raised. Rates have been set to ensure that, in the future, indirect costs are covered. In the event of a full tariff-based payment of costs being introduced, various disadvantages could be expected both for participants and the quality of the training. Changes in Swiss criminal law and the new medicines act do not forbid sponsoring, but they do call for rules of professional ethics and of personnel law in public hospitals governing behaviour in respect of funding by sponsors. Various sponsoring models are conceivable with differences in allocation to organizers, individual participants or distribution via a pool system. There are strong arguments in favour of continuing the existing practice of mixed funding by participants and sponsoring, provided that it is subject to certain rules of transparency. What is lacking to date is a political decision on the issue of funding for continuing medical education.

Keywords:
Conflict of Interest/legislation & jurisprudence Curriculum Drug Industry/legislation & jurisprudence Education, Medical, Continuing/economics Education, Medical, Continuing/legislation & jurisprudence* English Abstract Female Financing, Organized/economics Financing, Organized/legislation & jurisprudence* Gynecology/education* Humans Obstetrics/education* Quality Assurance, Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence* Switzerland Training Support/economics Training Support/legislation & jurisprudence*

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend