corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 12169

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Arguello B, Fernandez-Llimos F.
Clinical pharmacology information in summaries of product characteristics and package inserts.
Clin Pharmacol Ther 2007 Nov; 82:(5):566-71
http://www.nature.com/clpt/journal/v82/n5/abs/6100198a.html


Abstract:

The aim of the study was to assess the clinical pharmacology information provided in the summaries of product characteristics (SPCs) of European drugs compared with their package inserts. A list of the 150 most prescribed drugs at the local Health Service was assessed. To analyze clinical pharmacology information contained in package inserts and SPCs, Spyker’s systematized scoring approach was used (scoring from 0 to 2). Ninety-one SPCs (84.3%) and 108 package inserts were obtained. The mean score for core information provided in the package inserts was 7.94 (confidence interval (CI) 95 : 7.34-8.53), whereas for the SPCs it was 17.62 (CI 95 %: 16.48-18.75; 35.2 of the maximum). One core information item and two extra credit items were not contained in any of the SPCs. In the European Union the clinical pharmacology information found in SPCs is clearly insufficient. An improved access to and regular review of the SPCs might substantially improve the access and quality of clinical pharmacology and other prescribing information.

Keywords:
Clinical Pharmacy Information Systems Drug Information Services Drug Labeling* European Union Humans Pharmacology, Clinical* Spain United States

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.