corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 12100

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Hirschler B.
Drug firms hurt themselves by failing poor: Oxfam
Reuters 2007 Nov 26
http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSL2663997320071127?feedType=RSS&feedName=healthNews


Full text:

LONDON (Reuters) – The pharmaceutical industry is damaging its own business prospects in emerging markets by not doing more to get vital drugs to millions of people in poor countries, international charity Oxfam said on Tuesday.

Oxfam said the $700-billion-a-year industry had made “halting progress” in improving access to medicines in the past five years but big drug companies still saw the issue merely as a reputational problem, not a structural one.

As result, firms were missing out on the long-term potential of the developing world, according to a report from the Oxford-based organization.

“The industry is operating in a short-sighted way because it could gain enormous benefits from emerging markets, including lower research and development costs and cheaper manufacturing,” said Oxfam’s Head of Research Sumi Dhanarajan.

“Yet instead it continues to blindly use its same strategies in poor countries. Even today, the richest 15 percent of the world consumes over 90 percent of its pharmaceuticals. At this rate, both the industry and millions of sick patients are losing out.”

Drugmakers themselves say they are doing more than ever to help the world’s poor with a raft of initiatives designed to get healthcare to millions who cannot afford to pay Western prices.

Between 2000 and 2006, companies collectively made available more than 1.3 billion health interventions — mostly donations of drugs, vaccines and diagnostics — worth $6.7 billion, according to the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations.

Oxfam acknowledged manufacturers were offering some free drugs and making others available at discounted prices but said this supply was still extremely limited and mainly restricted to high-profile diseases like HIV/AIDS.

Drug companies should implement systematic and transparent tiered pricing, drop their inflexible attitude to patent protection and commit to more research into diseases that predominantly affect poor people, it concluded.

(Reporting by Ben Hirschler; Editing by David Cowell)

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909