corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 12076

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Big Pharma's problem is not 'image', says Oxfam
PMLive.com 2007 Nov 27
http://www.pmlive.com/index.cfm?showArticle=1&ArticleID=6279


Full text:

International aid charity Oxfam has said that the pharmaceutical industry is damaging its own business prospects in emerging markets by not doing more to get vital drugs to millions of people in poorer countries.

In a report, Oxfam accused the industry of seeing access as an exercise in improving its reputation and not as an opportunity to commit to structural reform. As result, added the charity, companies continued to miss out on the long-term business potential offered by the developing world.

Oxfam did concede that Big Pharma was making ‘halting progress’ by instituting free drug access programmes and heavily discounting prices in some poor countries, but criticised the industry for keeping the supply limited and restricted to high-profile diseases, such as HIV and AIDS.

The report concluded that the pharmaceutical industry should implement systematic and transparent tiered pricing, be more flexible in their application of patent protection and commit to more research into diseases affecting poorer countries, such as tuberculosis and malaria.

Oxfam’s head of research, Sumi Dhanarajan, said: “The industry is operating in a short-sighted way because it could gain enormous benefits from emerging markets, including lower research and development costs and cheaper manufacturing. Yet instead it continues to blindly use its same strategies in poor countries. Even today, the richest 15 per cent of the world consumes over 90 per cent of its pharmaceuticals.”

The industry defended its record of aid, citing initiatives designed to get healthcare to millions who cannot afford developed world prices.

The International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Association (IFPMA) said that between 2000 and 2006, the industry made more than 1.3 billion health interventions in the form of donations of drugs, vaccines and diagnostics worth a total of USD 6.7bn.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963