corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 12073

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Lukovitz K.
Physical Symptoms No. 1 Usage Driver for Health Sites
Marketing Daily 2007 Nov 27
http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.san&s=71565&Nid=36715&p=448587


Full text:

WHAT DRIVES CONSUMERS TO USE health-oriented Web sites?

More than half (55%) of online health site users recently surveyed by Woburn, Mass.-based lead-generation company Prospectiv said that they’re primarily seeking information about symptoms relating to a specific ailment or condition; 27% said they’re looking for tips on managing ailments and health conditions; and 18% said that they’re researching specific drug treatments for their own specific ailments.

The survey, conducted online with a random sample of 1,100 consumers, was a follow-up to research conducted in July.

The results reconfirmed that a majority of consumers (79%) use the Web as a health information resource, and that the types of sites used most are general health-focused sites (50%) and specific ailment-focused sites (35%). Just 13% of consumers said they rely most on branded pharmaceutical company sites. (In the earlier study, 54% favored general health sites, 37% specific ailment sites and 4% branded sites.)

This time, consumers who do not use branded sites were asked why. Most (57%) said they were unaware of such sites, although nearly a third (31%) said that they lack trust in the sites.

Among those who do rely most on branded sites, 65% said it’s because the sites are very informative, 28% said that the sites provide the most accurate information on available drug treatment, and 7% said the company’s branded newsletters are very informative.

Just 2% of people who use the Web for health information said that they rely most heavily on online communities for this purpose, and just 12% reported belonging to online communities. However, 68% said that they would register for an e-newsletter to learn more about drug treatments or how to treat a specific ailment, and 60% said that they would use interactive resources (e-mail groups, forums and communities) to share ailment and drug information with others if more of these resources were available.

“Again, we found that when it comes to branded sites, lack of awareness, rather than mistrust, is the dominant issue,” says Prospective president/CEO Jere Doyle. He adds that it’s also clear that brands need to leverage the opportunities in buying search words relating to specific ailments and conditions, and in registering people for e-newsletters that address their illnesses.

What about the 21% of respondents who don’t use the Net at all for finding heath information? Nearly half (47%) said that they don’t know how to find the right sites to help them, 41% said they had thus far not needed to find such information, and 12% said they don’t feel comfortable using the Web to research sensitive personal information.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909