corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 12026

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Tuma RS.
Business barriers slowing the pace of cancer immunotherapy research and development.
J Natl Cancer Inst 2007 Nov 7; 99:(21):1570-3 Epub 2007 Oct 30.
http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/extract/99/21/1570


Abstract:

No cancer vaccines and only a handful of antitumor immunotherapies have gained regulatory approval, despite several decades of effort. Experts think that increased knowledge about the immune system and better agents are starting to change this.

However, regulatory and intellectual property issues currently hinder development of such therapies, they say, and will continue to cause problems unless researchers have better access to agents that are still under investigation. Two recent government-sponsored meetings highlighted these concerns, and some scientific leaders are even calling for the U.S. Congress to step in.

Testing agents together in combinations, as immune-system therapies often require, is a particular problem. Companies fear that their drug applications will be slowed down if they let outside researchers use their investigational drugs in any trial that might link the agent with side effects. But that approach often leaves agents to languish for years-agents that researchers say could be successfully attacking . . .

Raising the Issues

Identifying Key Agents

Adjuvants

Examples May Illuminate the Mounting Cancer Vaccine Development Problem

Keywords:
Publication Types: News MeSH Terms: Adjuvants, Immunologic*/economics Animals Antineoplastic Agents*/adverse effects Antineoplastic Agents*/economics Biomedical Research/economics* Cancer Vaccines*/economics Drug Approval Drug Design Drug Industry Drugs, Investigational*/adverse effects Drugs, Investigational*/economics Financing, Government* Humans Immunotherapy/economics* Male National Institutes of Health (U.S.) Neoplasms/economics* Neoplasms/immunology Neoplasms/therapy* Prostatic Neoplasms/economics Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy United States United States Food and Drug Administration Substances: Adjuvants, Immunologic Antineoplastic Agents Cancer Vaccines Drugs, Investigational

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.