corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 11973

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Silverman E.
Cephalon Will Pay $425M For Off-Label Marketing
Pharmalot 2007 Nov 8
http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/11/cephalon-will-pay-425m-for-off-label-marketing/


Full text:

The drugmaker struck a deal with the US Attorney in Philadelphia, and will sign a corporate integrity agreement after agreeing to a misdemeanor violation of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. The probe reportedly focused on whether Cephalon sales reps were improperly marketing its Provigil narcolepsy drug, which docs have prescribed to treat depression and ADHD.

The settlement doesn’t come as a surprise. Cephalon has been under a microscope for off-label marketing for awhile. Last February, the FDA sent the drugmaker a warning letter ordering an end to promotional material for Provigil that included claims that the drug could be used to treat fatigue, which isn’t an approved use.

Two months ago, Cephalon sent letters to docs this week warning that several deaths have been linked to Fentora, a highly addictive narcotic used to treat acute cancer pain. Here’s the catch – Fentora and its predecessor, Actiq, are approved only for use in cancer patients, but are often prescribed off-label for headaches and back pain.

“We have always taken seriously our responsibility to conduct our business in accordance with both the letter and spirit of the law,” Frank Baldino Jr., Cephalon’s ceo and chairman, says in a statement. “Over the past few years, we have devoted substantial resources to continually enhancing our compliance program and have built a strong foundation for our ongoing compliance efforts.”

Really? Cephalon execs themselves must have suffered from narcolepsy – it appears they were asleep on the job.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








You are going to have many difficulties. The smokers will not like your message. The tobacco interests will be vigorously opposed. The media and the government will be loath to support these findings. But you have one factor in your favour. What you have going for you is that you are right.
- Evarts Graham
See:
When truth is unwelcome: the first reports on smoking and lung cancer.