corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 11856

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Okechukwu I, Mahmud A, Bennett K, Feely J.
Choice of first antihypertensive - are existing guidelines ignored?
Br J Clin Pharmacol 2007 Oct 22;
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.03005.x


Abstract:

What is already known about this subject

  • Recommended treatment guidelines for hypertension have been developed to assist GPs’ decisions about appropriate therapies.
  • The British Hypertension Society’s (BHS) 2004 guidelines recommend initial drug choice based on age, and avoidance of beta-adrenoceptor blockers in diabetes.

What this study adds

  • Prescribing of first-line antihypertensives in Ireland appears guided by age, but mainly for those under 55 years.
  • Adherence to the guidelines was in part related to patient gender.
  • Presence of concomitant diabetes had a greater influence on the choice of therapy than age of patient.

Aims To determine adherence to hypertension guidelines in relation to age and diabetes.

Methods The Irish HSE-PCRS prescribing database identified patients initiating antihypertensive monotherapy in 2005. Logistic regression predicted the likelihood of therapy according to guidelines.

Results The odds ratio (OR) of receiving therapies according to the guideline recommendations in those <55 years vs. >/=55 years was 1.31 (95% CI 1.26, 1.37). Diabetics were more likely than nondiabetics to receive antihypertensives other than beta-adrenoceptor blockers (OR 2.97, 95% CI 2.74, 3.21).

Conclusions Our findings show some adherence to the guidelines in relation to age but selective prescribing of antihypertensives for diabetics.

E-mail: okechuki@tcd.i.e

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909