corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 11849

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

FDA Probing Generic Wellbutrin XL
Associated Press 2007 Oct 25
http://web.archive.org/web/20071031052321/http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/10/25/ap4264743.html


Full text:

TORONTO – The U.S. Food and Drug Administration said Thursday it is investigating complaints about a generic version of the antidepressant drug Wellbutrin XL after users reported having headaches, anxiety and other ailments.

FDA spokesperson Sandy Walsh told Dow Jones Newswires the agency is also reviewing the scientific formulation of the drug, called Budeprion XL, after a consumer-product testing group published results that showed key differences from the original drug.

The tests, conducted by ConsumerLab.com, came after Budeprion XL users earlier this year began complaining that the drug caused severe headaches, digestive problems, anxiety, tremors, and insomnia. Another Web site, peoplespharmacy.com, reported that more than 250 people had complained about the drug.

Budeprion XL is made by Hayward, Calif.-based Impax Laboratories Inc. and sold by Israeli firm Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.

Impax Chief Financial Officer Arthur Koch said the company is studying ConsumerLab’s results, but noted the drug went through a full scientific evaluation.

“Our studies were very good, and we were very satisfied with them, and by receiving that approval so was the FDA,” he told Dow Jones, adding that Impax would cooperate with the FDA’s probe.

“We remain confident in our product,” he said. “We’re going to work through this in a professional and responsible way.”

In ConsumerLab’s test, the once-daily Budeprion XL released 34 percent of its active ingredient after two hours, compared to 8 percent for the original drug.

“It’s been an eye-opener for everyone,” said Dr. Tod Cooperman, president of ConsumerLab.com. “It makes you question whether generics are always going to be equivalent to the original product. If these things are releasing at such different rates, it’s hard to believe they’d be acting the same way in your body.”

Earlier Thursday, the FDA said it could not provide data to support ConsumerLab’s findings.

FDA cannot offer any examples where generics have been shown to not perform as expected. FDA has many years of experience in the review of generic drugs and has great confidence in the quality and equivalence of generic drug products,” the agency said.

In a statement, Teva said its “number one priority is to provide safe, effective and affordable generic products to patients.”

In 2005, Canadian firm Biovial petitioned the FDA to require rigorous testing on generic versions of Wellbutrin XL before being approved. While some saw it as a delay tactic, the company said it was to protect patients from serious risks, such as seizures.

The FDA approved the first generic versions of Wellbutrin XL in 2006.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








As an advertising man, I can assure you that advertising which does not work does not continue to run. If experience did not show beyond doubt that the great majority of doctors are splendidly responsive to current [prescription drug] advertising, new techniques would be devised in short order. And if, indeed, candor, accuracy, scientific completeness, and a permanent ban on cartoons came to be essential for the successful promotion of [prescription] drugs, advertising would have no choice but to comply.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963