corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 11707

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Haussler B, Schiffhorst G, Gothe H, Hempel E.
The impact of pharmaceuticals on the decline of cardiovascular mortality in Germany.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2007 Oct; 16:(10):1167-76
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/114277041/ABSTRACT?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0


Abstract:

PURPOSE: The effect of innovative medicines and surgical interventions on the decline of (cardiovascular) mortality is often called into question. The increase in general economic prosperity is often seen as the main reason for the continuous increase in life expectancy. The purpose of this study is to investigate the extent to which mortality from cardiovascular diseases has been affected by pharmaceuticals and other medical interventions over the last 30 years in Germany.

METHODS: Main outcome measures were the time series of direct method death rates (DMDR) of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortalities. To control for socioeconomic and secular trends the difference between both time series was calculated. The impact of interventions on mortality was analysed by developing two linear regression models: The onset model analyses whether the introduction of interventions influences mortality or not. The consumption model estimates the quantitative impact of interventions in two phases.

RESULTS: Cardiovascular mortality as a percentage of total mortality fell from 40 to 38% over the study period. All investigated interventions had statistically significant effects on the decline of cardiovascular diseases, which is expressed by the standardised regression coefficient: onset model: preventive behaviour index (PBI) -8.3, angioplasty/CABG -0.6, antithrombotic agents -1.5, diuretics -0.9, beta-blockers -1.0, calcium channel blockers -0.8 and ACE inhibitors -1.1 (all interventions p < 0.01); consumption model: innovative drugs phase I -7.5 (p = 0.017), innovative drugs phase II -6.9 (p < 0.01), PBI -13.1 (p < 0.01) and angioplasty/CABG -9.9 (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: All innovative drug classes and surgical interventions had a positive effect on the decline of cardiovascular mortality.

Bertram Häussler (bh@iges.de)

Keywords:
innovative medicines • surgical interventions • cardiovascular mortality PMID: 17551995 [PubMed - in process]

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.