corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 11688

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Korczyn AD.
Drug trials in dementia: challenging ethical dilemmas.
Curr Alzheimer Res 2007 Sep; 4:(4):468-72
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/ben/car/2007/00000004/00000004/art00018?token=00511708ec5aa35264f65263a3d4f58762f467c405847447b23446c244044765720745d3e3ffaeb23


Abstract:

Advances in the treatment of demented individuals is critically dependent upon experimental administration of new drugs to such people, who, by definition, frequently cannot provide informed consent. Ethical problems associated with studies on demented individuals are therefore of great importance. While there is some similarity to other groups (children, psychotic individuals and patients in coma) there also exist several differences. Obtaining an informed consent from a dementing individual is always problematic. Advance directives are helpful to caregivers and patients should be encouraged, at early stages of the disease, to provide them. Participation in drug studies carries inherent benefits to patients, but at the same time exposes them to risks and discomforts which should be monitored and reviewed more intensively than in studies on cognitively intact individuals. The vulnerability of demented people and their dependence requires special attention by the institutional review board (IRB), unique items to be included in the study protocols and consent forms, etc. Representatives of patients’ advocacy groups can make important contributions to the IRB, to serve the best interests of the patient and prevent exploitation by the industry as well as by researchers, and honoring the autonomy of the patients. It would be helpful and justified to enable subjects to continue in the study in an open-label design in this situation, once they sign a suitable informed consent. A no-fault insurance could be provided to the patient in this situation.

Keywords:
PMID: 17908051 [PubMed - in process] Caregivers; institutional review board; controlled drug trial; dementing people

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.