corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 11676

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Berndt ER, Glennerster R, Kremer MR, Lee J, Levine R, Weizsacker G, Williams H.
Advance market commitments for vaccines against neglected diseases: estimating costs and effectiveness.
Health Econ 2007 May; 16:(5):491-511
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/113385484/ABSTRACT?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0


Abstract:

The G8 is considering committing to purchase vaccines against diseases concentrated in low-income countries (if and when desirable vaccines are developed) as a way to spur research and development on vaccines for these diseases. Under such an ‘advance market commitment,’ one or more sponsors would commit to a minimum price to be paid per person immunized for an eligible product, up to a certain number of individuals immunized. For additional purchases, the price would eventually drop to close to marginal cost. If no suitable product were developed, no payments would be made. We estimate the offer size which would make revenues similar to the revenues realized from investments in typical existing commercial pharmaceutical products, as well as the degree to which various model contracts and assumptions would affect the cost-effectiveness of such a commitment. We make adjustments for lower marketing costs under an advance market commitment and the risk that a developer may have to share the market with subsequent developers. We also show how this second risk could be reduced, and money saved, by introducing a superiority clause to a commitment. Under conservative assumptions, we document that a commitment comparable in value to sales earned by the average of a sample of recently launched commercial products (adjusted for lower marketing costs) would be a highly cost-effective way to address HIV/AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis. Sensitivity analyses suggest most characteristics of a hypothetical vaccine would have little effect on the cost-effectiveness, but that the duration of protection conferred by a vaccine strongly affects potential cost-effectiveness. Readers can conduct their own sensitivity analyses employing a web-based spreadsheet tool.

Keywords:
advance market commitment • R&D • pharmaceuticals • vaccines Publication Types: Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH Terms: Biological Therapy/economics* Communicable Disease Control/economics* Communicable Disease Control/methods Cost-Benefit Analysis Developing Countries Drug Evaluation/economics* Drug Industry/economics* Economics, Pharmaceutical Great Britain HIV Infections/prevention & control Health Care Sector* Humans Malaria/prevention & control Tuberculosis/prevention & control Vaccines/economics* Vaccines/supply & distribution Substances: Vaccines

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend