corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 11512

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Iheanacho I.
Drug pricing: Author's reply
BMJ 2007 Sep 22; 335:(7620):578
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/335/7620/578-a?etoc


Abstract:

Burnand gives a predictable, if disappointing, response from an industry that has done very well out of the unequivocally flawed Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Scheme. In seeking to challenge the basic principles of value based systems, the response attempts to downgrade some instances of where such pricing has provided tangible societal benefits, while completely sidestepping other examples (such as the systems in Canada and Sweden). The dig at the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in Australia is superficial and potentially misleading, and those seeking a more balanced view of the regulation of drug prices in that country (including recent changes) would do well to look elsewhere.1 2 3 4

Reforming the pricing system in the UK will require constructive contributions from the pharmaceutical industry, for which Burnand’s comments are a poor model.

Ike Iheanacho, editor, Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin

BMA House, London WC1H 9JR

ike.iheanacho@bmjgroup.com

————————————————————————————————————————
Competing interests: None declared.

1. Australian Government, Department for Health and Ageing. Strengthening your PBS-preparing for the future. 2006. www.health.gov.au/internet/wcms/publishing.nsf/Content/A2F23E7630B8F9F3CA257227007F1EC7/$File/strengthening -your-PBS161106.pdf
2. Australian Government, Department for Health and Ageing. The pharmaceutical benefits scheme (PBS) reform. 2006. www.health.gov.au/internet/wcms/publishing.nsf/Content/24693658DD49E286CA2572750081DB74/$File/PBS%20Reform%202Feb07.pdf
3. Searles A, Jefferys S, Doran E, Henry DA. Reference pricing, generic drugs and proposed changes to the pharmaceutical benefits scheme. Med J Aust 2007;187:236-9.[Medline]
4. Harvey KJ, Harris AH, Bulfone L. The national health amendment (pharmaceutical benefits scheme) bill 2007: reform or fracture? Med J Aust 2007;187:206-7.[Medline]

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909