corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 11509

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Neibauer M.
Measure would put drug sales reps under microscope
The Examiner 2007 Sep 19
http://www.examiner.com/a-943107~Measure_would_put_drug_sales_reps_under_microscope.html


Full text:

The pharmaceutical sales representatives who regularly peddle their merchandise to D.C. physicians would have to be licensed under a bill to be considered by the D.C. Council. “The person who cuts your hair is subject to more government regulation than the person pitching drugs to your doctor,” said Council Member David Catania, chair of the health committee.

Catania on Tuesday introduced the Safe Rx Act of 2007, which he claims will “lead to a safer environment, a more informed environment” for consumers of prescription medications.

The bill also tackles off-label prescription use – uses not explicitly approved by the Food and Drug Administration – as well as gifts to regulators and disclosure of clinical drug trial data.

The legislation requires that all new pharmaceutical reps hold a license issued by the D.C. Board of Pharmacy, earn at least a bachelor’s degree in pharmacy or science, and follow a new code of ethics for the profession.

There is a grandfather clause for salespeople with at least one year on the job. The average D.C. doctor meets with 28 representatives a week, Catania claimed, and most are chosen for their looks, not their medical knowledge. It is believed the bill’s licensing provision is the first of its kind in the country.

The measure drew the immediate condemnation of the drug lobby.

In a statement, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America said comprehensively trained drug sales representatives are carefully monitored through “adequate safeguards” established by the Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Department of Justice, and follow voluntary guidelines issue by PhRMA.

In addition to the sales rep provisions, the bill also requires that D.C. physicians obtain patients’ informed consent before they are prescribed a medication for off-label use.

From Celebrex to Lyrica, thousands of drugs have been developed for one purpose but found to be helpful for something else, said Dr. Peter Lavine, chairman of the Medical Society of D.C.

“These are onerous, unnecessary burdens placed on physicians, and it’s going to have a chilling effect on the appropriate off-label use of medication,” Lavine said.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909