corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 1141

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Koppel N.
Patents Making Drugs Too Expensive
The Associated Press 2003 May 22


Full text:

GENEVA – Poor countries are granting more patents on medicines than necessary, making crucial drugs far too costly for them, the humanitarian group Doctors Without Borders said in a report Thursday.

Many developing countries do not have the scientific expertise to decide whether a patent is justified, so they grant protection even when it is not required under international law, the report said.

“It is becoming increasingly clear that drugs that are under patent are a barrier to access because this leads to higher prices,” said Ellen ‘t Hoen, of the group’s campaign for access to essential medicines. “Drug patents can and should be challenged.”

Inventors must apply for patents individually in each country where they want to obtain protection. Without a patent, there would be nothing to stop a generic manufacturer from copying the process used to make a drug.

Pascale Boulez, one of the authors of the report, said that poor nations simply grant patents without carrying out investigations.

Many West African countries granted patent protection to GlaxoSmithKline’s AIDS treatment Combivir within a couple of years of its 1997 filing, while the European Union is still studying the application.

“Patents were not created to enrich inventors, but to benefit society as a whole by promoting innovation,” the report said.

Harvey Bale, director-general of the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Associations, said patents are necessary even in developing countries to promote research and development of new drugs.

“Why should you throw out the patent system? That is a very short-term, static view which is very typical of some of the activists,” he said. “That would be a respectable view if you were at the end of the history of drug development. But I don’t know a single therapy where we are at the end of history.”

He said patent holders can often supply the drugs to poor nations more cheaply than generic producers because they have larger production and distribution systems and can make profits by selling the same drugs at higher prices elsewhere.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








There is no sin in being wrong. The sin is in our unwillingness to examine our own beliefs, and in believing that our authorities cannot be wrong. Far from creating cynics, such a story is likely to foster a healthy and creative skepticism, which is something quite different from cynicism.”
- Neil Postman in The End of Education