corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 1141

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Koppel N.
Patents Making Drugs Too Expensive
The Associated Press 2003 May 22


Full text:

GENEVA – Poor countries are granting more patents on medicines than necessary, making crucial drugs far too costly for them, the humanitarian group Doctors Without Borders said in a report Thursday.

Many developing countries do not have the scientific expertise to decide whether a patent is justified, so they grant protection even when it is not required under international law, the report said.

“It is becoming increasingly clear that drugs that are under patent are a barrier to access because this leads to higher prices,” said Ellen ‘t Hoen, of the group’s campaign for access to essential medicines. “Drug patents can and should be challenged.”

Inventors must apply for patents individually in each country where they want to obtain protection. Without a patent, there would be nothing to stop a generic manufacturer from copying the process used to make a drug.

Pascale Boulez, one of the authors of the report, said that poor nations simply grant patents without carrying out investigations.

Many West African countries granted patent protection to GlaxoSmithKline’s AIDS treatment Combivir within a couple of years of its 1997 filing, while the European Union is still studying the application.

“Patents were not created to enrich inventors, but to benefit society as a whole by promoting innovation,” the report said.

Harvey Bale, director-general of the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Associations, said patents are necessary even in developing countries to promote research and development of new drugs.

“Why should you throw out the patent system? That is a very short-term, static view which is very typical of some of the activists,” he said. “That would be a respectable view if you were at the end of the history of drug development. But I don’t know a single therapy where we are at the end of history.”

He said patent holders can often supply the drugs to poor nations more cheaply than generic producers because they have larger production and distribution systems and can make profits by selling the same drugs at higher prices elsewhere.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909