corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 11301

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Breast cancer decline attributed to drop in HRT
Reuters Health 2007 Aug 24
http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSROB47731420070824


Full text:

Invasive breast cancer rates have fallen since the substantial decline in postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) occurred, even after a decline in breast cancer screening rates, according to findings published in the 5th Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

“It’s encouraging that breast cancer rates decreased with decreases in use of hormone therapy,” Dr. Karla Kerlikowske told Reuters Health. This implies that women who stopped using hormone therapy in a relatively short period of time have a risk of breast cancer similar to women who have never used hormone therapy.”

Kerlikowske from San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the University of California, San Francisco, and colleagues examined whether parallel declines in postmenopausal HRT use and rates of breast cancer are present among women undergoing routine screening mammography.

They point out that the breast cancer detection rate is higher in women undergoing mammography, so “the proportion of women in the population undergoing routine screening mammography will influence population-based estimates of breast cancer incidence.”

The prevalence of postmenopausal HRT use started to decline about the same time that observational studies in early 2000 linked use of estrogen and progestin combinations to greater breast cancer risk than use of estrogen alone. An even greater decline followed the release of the Women’s Health Initiative study in 2002.

The current study involved over 600,000 screening mammograms on women 50-69 years of age, of whom 3238 were diagnosed with breast cancer. The rate of estrogen receptor-positive invasive cancer was stable until 2001, but declined 13 percent per year from 2001 to 2003, the report indicates. Rates of estrogen receptor-negative invasive cancer did not change during this interval.

“Our results suggest that a decline in postmenopausal HRT use has contributed to the decline in breast cancer incidence in the United States,” the investigators conclude. “The small decline in screening mammography observed in the United States is unlikely to explain the national declines in breast cancer incidence.”

“For those women who need to take estrogen and progestin to control hot flush symptoms, they should be encouraged to take the medication for as short a time as possible,” Kerlikowske emphasized.

“We are monitoring women who discontinue postmenopausal hormone therapy to determine if their screening mammography utilization changes, and to measure their risk of breast cancer over time compared to never-users of hormone therapy,” Kerlikowske added.

SOURCE: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, September 5, 2007.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909