corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 11265

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Irwin T.
Report: Top Drugs Compromised by Online 'Brandjackers'
Marketing Daily 2007 Aug 23
http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.san&s=66215&Nid=33540&p=448587


Full text:

IT’S THE RARE INTERNET USER who hasn’t received spam offering “cheap” Viagra, Cialis or other drugs. Those e-mails are a serious threat to the integrity of the top pharma brands, and their companies need to address the problem, a study asserts.

San Francisco-based MarkMonitor recently released the Summer 2007 Brandjacking Index, reporting that online scammers increasingly abuse the top-ranked brands and endanger consumers by selling questionable prescription drugs through dubious online pharmacies.

In the case of prescription drug sites that sell the most popular brands, the report showed that the majority operate without proper credentials and lack even the most basic e-commerce security features—risking customers’ health and putting their personal information at risk.

The study, MarkMonitor’s second quarterly survey, made some startling discoveries: Most of the sites advertised are unlikely to be the real thing—and in many cases, operators say the sites are run in the U.S. or Canada, but in fact the businesses are traced to countries like China, Russia or India.

MarkMonitor officials suggest that pharma companies should take responsibility for protecting their brands online in order to preserve the integrity of their brands, their reputations, revenues and customers.

“Caveat emptor on the part of consumers is not a sufficient response to the depredations of online scammers and thieves,” says Irfan Salim, MarkMonitor president, in a release. “The data show brandjackers are profoundly exploiting brands, using increasingly sophisticated tactics, and, in the case of the pharmaceutical industry, posing an outright danger to consumers through questionable practices that indicate counterfeiting and gray markets.”

The quarterly MarkMonitor Brandjacking Index is an independent report that measures the effect of online threats to brands. In addition to tracking 30 leading brands, the summer report includes a research focus on online abuses of pharmaceutical brands, as well as an investigation of the counterfeit/gray market for popular prescription drugs.

The report’s drug and online channel abuse data for the online pharmaceutical market is based on six leading drug brands: three of the highest-ranking drug products, according to the “Top 200 Brands for 2006 by U.S. Sales” study by Drugs.com, and three of the most frequently searched drug products online.

MarkMonitor examined the contents of billions of Web pages and 60 million spam e-mails advertising six popular drugs captured over a four-week period in June. The company won’t name the drugs, but will say they included well-known brands of widely sold drugs for erectile dysfunction.

Of the 3,160 online pharmacies studied, only four are accredited as Verified Internet Pharmacy Practice Sites—the industry credential that assures consumers of legitimate online pharmacy operations. And 10% of the online pharmacies studied clearly state no prescription is required to purchase the drugs.

One-third of the online pharmacies in the study generate enough traffic to merit a ranking by Alexa.com, which measures Web traffic. Each of these sites sees an average of 32,000 visitors daily. Using industry statistics for traffic conversion and average order sizes, MarkMonitor estimates that this traffic converts to $4 billion in annual sales for the six drug brands studied. Tanya Irwin can be reached at tanya@mediapost.com.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963