corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 1125

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Zwillich T.
Lawmakers OK Bill to Stop Rx Coercion in Schools
Reuters Health 2003 May 15


Full text:

WASHINGTON (Reuters Health) A House committee approved a bill on Thursday directing states to bar public schools from requiring children with behavior problems to take medication before they can attend classes.

Specifically, the bill directs states to come up with policies banning the practice as a precondition for receiving federal education dollars.

Some parents of children with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and other illnesses have complained that schools required the children to take drugs, such as Ritalin, to be allowed to attend school.

Prescriptions for Ritalin and similar stimulant drugs have skyrocketed in recent years, with an estimated 3 million to 6 million U.S. children currently taking them. The explosion in use has prompted fears among some groups that the medications are used indiscriminately to control behavior in unruly children.

Lawmakers said Thursday that their bill would discourage such requirements, which are already banned by state law in Connecticut, Minnesota, Illinois and Virginia.

Teachers “don’t need to diagnose, nor should they diagnose. They’re not trained to do that,” said Rep. John A. Boehner, R-Ohio, chair of the Education and Workforce Committee.

Several Democrats objected to the bill, emphasizing that there are no reliable studies showing that medication coercion is a widespread problem in U.S. schools.

“We really didn’t have any evidence other than anecdotal evidence,” said Rep. Lynn Woolsey, D-Calif.

“We have anecdotal evidence, but it is overwhelming,” answered Rep. Max Burns, R-Ga., the bill’s chief sponsor.

The committee voted to clarify the bill’s language to make it clear that teachers should not be barred from discussing behavioral disorders or medications with parents and must only avoid policies requiring medications before class attendance.

Still, mental health groups worried that the bill could wind up having a chilling effect on contacts between teachers, school officials, and parents that often identify untreated mental disorders in kids.

“It is going to erect further barriers to treatment,” said Ralph Ibsen, chief lobbyist for the National Mental Health Association.

Lawmakers turned back an amendment that would have applied the bill’s prohibition to all psychotropic drugs, including those used to treat depression, psychosis and anxiety. They later approved language calling for a federal study of the extent of use of psychotropic drugs in U.S. schools.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909