corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 11066

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

NHS drug costs to be renegotiated
BBC News 2007 Aug 2
http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6927814.stm


Full text:

Health Secretary Alan Johnson is to renegotiate a five-year agreement with pharmaceutical companies on the price of drugs to the NHS.

The Office of Fair Trading recently condemned the Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Scheme which allows drug companies to set their own prices.

It said the NHS was paying drug firms hundreds of millions of pounds too much for branded drugs.

The Department of Health said the system needed updating for efficiency.

Value for money

The OFT suggested a move to pricing drugs based on health impact rather than the cost to manufacturers could save £500m from the NHS’ current drugs bill which stands at more than £8 billion a year.

The announcement comes as the government publishes its interim response to the OFT report.

A Department of Health spokesman said: “The OFT concluded that the pricing system should have a more value-based approach in order to deliver greater benefit to patients.

“It said reform could deliver better value for money for the NHS. The Secretary of State has therefore decided that it is timely to enter into a dialogue with the industry to renegotiate the PPRS.”

He said any new agreement would recognise the contribution of the pharmaceutical industry to the UK economy.

“It is in all our interests to encourage research and reward innovation, but above all we want to ensure that the taxpayer gets value for money and patients continue to benefit from innovative products at a reasonable price.”

The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry said that the PPRS had done a “good job” of delivering value for money in healthcare, but welcomed a review.

Nigel Brooksby, president of the ABPI, said: “The PPRS has brought many benefits to the NHS and to the UK as a whole. It is essential that these remain integral to the PPRS as it evolves.”

He said the pharmaceutical industry recognised the government’s need to gain best value for money from all aspects of NHS services, including medicines.

Liberal Democrat health spokesman John Pugh said: “The relationship between the pharmaceutical industry and the British government has been far too cosy for too long. This renegotiation is a very welcome development.”

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909