corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 11027

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Goldstein J.
Could Stricter Safety Rules Help Drug Makers?
The Wall Street Journal Health Blog 2007 Jul 18
http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2007/07/18/could-stricter-drug-safety-rules-help-drug-makers/?mod=yahoo_hs


Full text:

Conventional wisdom holds that the stricter drug-safety rules in the offing in Washington could burden the drug industry and harm sales. But in a post this morning, the In Vivo Blog argues that the tougher safety rules could help industry by boosting the odds that drugs go to the right patients and by making it easier for drug makers to weather safety problems that arise after drugs make it to market.

The In Vivo case study is Xolair, an asthma drug co-marketed by Novartis and Genentech. The drug, given by injection, carries a black-box warning about a life-threatening but rare allergic reaction called anaphylaxis. Genentech is using a multi-pronged pronged strategy to manage the drug’s safety issues, In Vivo write, and the approach incorporates measures that the FDA could soon begin imposing more often.

The safeguards include giving patients a brochure about the risks before each injection; asking doctors to keep patients in the office after the injection for observation; conducting follow-up surveys with doctors and patients; creating a database that will allow researchers to compare patients who had serious reactions against patients who did not; and trying to come up with a skin test that will predict which patients are likely to have serious reactions.

The risk-management plan “cements the company’s position with providers and assures that the product will be restricted to a very sick group of patients: a group which justifies the current high cost of the treatment,” In Vivo argues. “If FDA’s new authority makes more companies adopt plans like this, the industry could be headed into a period when postmarketing problems become resolvable and not the cause of sudden product withdrawals.”

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909