corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 11008

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Dyer C.
Doctor ordered to pay 300,000 pounds sterling in libel damages.
BMJ 2007 Jul 21; 335:(7611):119
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/335/7611/119


Abstract:

A company that investigates research fraud on behalf of the drug industry as well as its chief executive and former medical adviser have been awarded libel damages of £300 000 (445 000; $615 000) against a doctor who is currently facing serious charges before the General Medical Council of research misconduct and dishonesty.

Tonmoy Sharma, a former senior lecturer at the Institute of Psychiatry in London, was ordered by the High Court in London to pay the damages, together with costs, to MedicoLegal Investigations (MLI), its chief executive, Peter Jay, and the retired medical adviser Frank Wells.

Dr Sharma conducted a number of trials for major drug companies in the late 1990s and built up an international reputation before MLI was called in to investigate after several sponsors grew suspicious about his work. The material gathered by MLI led to the GMC proceedings.

The GMC accuses him of having . . .

Keywords:
Publication Types: News MeSH Terms: Compensation and Redress* Drug Industry/economics Drug Industry/legislation & jurisprudence* Great Britain Liability, Legal Malpractice/economics Malpractice/legislation & jurisprudence* Psychiatry/economics Psychiatry/legislation & jurisprudence*

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.