corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 10974

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Drug Safety Spending May Be Increased
Associated Press 2007 Jul 11
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/070711/drug_safety.html?.v=1


Full text:

Congress Moves to Increase Drug Safety Spending to $400 Million

WASHINGTON (AP) — Congress is moving to give federal health officials more money to monitor prescription drug safety, part of an effort to avoid another Vioxx debacle.
The House was expected to approve legislation Wednesday that would give the Food and Drug Administration nearly $400 million, collected as fees from the drug industry, to spend on drug safety over the next five years. The Senate has already approved similar legislation.

Both bills also would give the agency more power to require drug companies to do follow-up studies on certain medicines. The House version would require the FDA to periodically review the safety of those drugs as well. It also seeks stricter limits on experts with conflicts of interest from advising the FDA, and would require drug ads to include a toll-free number and Web address for consumers to report side effects.

The FDA was criticized for being too slow to respond once serious problems were linked to the painkiller Vioxx, made by Merck & Co. The drug was withdrawn voluntarily in 2004 after research showed it doubled the risk of heart attacks and strokes.

The legislation’s underlying purpose is to renew, through 2012, a program that has the drug industry pay fees to the agency to defray the cost of reviewing new medicines. In the wake of the Vioxx withdrawal and subsequent problems with other drugs, lawmakers seized on the legislation to overhaul how the FDA handles the safety of the drugs it regulates.

Once the legislation is approved, the House and Senate will have to resolve differences between the versions.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909