corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 10961

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Cohen MJ, Rosenzweig TS, Revel A.
Uterine abnormalities and embryo implantation: clinical opinion altered by peer debate.
Reprod Biomed Online 2007 May; 14:(5):555-8
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/repro/rebi/2007/00000014/00000005/art00004?token=0050151979ef56d6222346b6268763050212a67232d45237b75245a7b4d2c2066523e3f7f3645ad1


Abstract:

Medical professionals often hold different views on patient treatment. This study assessed the degree to which these views differ and the degree to which these opinions changed following peer debate. The authors used an audience response system at an Israeli Fertility Association symposium. Clinical cases in the field of reproductive surgery were presented and the favoured management approach was recorded from each participant before and after holding peer debates. The cases presented were: endometrial assessment prior to artificial reproductive treatment, the management of thin endometrium, endometrial septum, intramural fibroid and hydrosalpinx. All audience responses were analysed. There was variability in answers in all five clinical scenarios. Before and after debates, the proportions of physicians preferring referral to prophylactic surgery due to endometrial septum, intramural fibroid and hydrosalpinx were 61% versus 59%, 12% versus 10% and 41% versus 37%, respectively. While these overall proportions remained similar, significantly more clinicians changed their approach regarding septum and hydrosalpinx management, compared with fibroid management (18%, 18% and 8% respectively, P = 0.03). Medical professionals are likely to change their approach in some clinical cases more than others. It is postulated that treatment risk and lack of good evidence account for these differences.

Keywords:
ENDOMETRIUM; FIBROIDS; HYDROSALPINX; IVF; REPRODUCTIVE SURGERY; SEPTATE UTERUS MeSH Terms: Dissent and Disputes* Embryo Implantation Expert Testimony* Fallopian Tubes/surgery* Female Humans Leiomyoma/surgery* Peer Group Persuasive Communication Physicians/psychology* Uterine Neoplasms/surgery* Uterus/surgery*

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








There is no sin in being wrong. The sin is in our unwillingness to examine our own beliefs, and in believing that our authorities cannot be wrong. Far from creating cynics, such a story is likely to foster a healthy and creative skepticism, which is something quite different from cynicism.”
- Neil Postman in The End of Education