corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 10842

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Kmietowicz Z.
Doctors reject call for a ban on advertisements of reformulated drugs
BMJ 2007 Jul 7; 335:(7609):14
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/335/7609/14


Abstract:

BMA representatives at their annual meeting in Torquay rejected a request for the BMJ to boycott advertisements for drugs which are remarketed and reformulated by pharmaceutical companies because they are due to lose their patent.

Stuart Blake, from Lothian, who proposed the motion, said he had no objections to the marketing strategy by some companies to replace drugs that are about to lose their patents with new formulations or enantiomers, but he did object to the fact that the old version of the drug was often withdrawn. He called this a “reprehensible activity.”

“It [remarketing old drugs] is not in the best interests of doctors, patients, or the NHS,” he said. The only purpose of the activity was to maintain the profits of the pharmaceutical companies involved.

Supporting the motion, Gerard Millen, a student BMA representative, complained that the cost of reformulated drugs was often four to 10 times that . . .

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963