corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 10801

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Johnson A.
Feds May Rejigger Payment for Bundled Drugs
The Wall Street Journal Health Blog 2007 Jul 3
http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2007/07/03/feds-may-rejigger-payment-for-bundled-drugs/?mod=yahoo_hs


Full text:

The government is looking to adjust a reimbursement policy that’s drawn harsh criticism from doctors. The adjustment, proposed yesterday, could help doctors who say they’re getting strong-armed by Amgen’s strategy of bundling multiple drugs.

Since 2005, Medicare has been reimbursing physicians who administer injected and infused drugs based on a metric called “average sales price.” It’s meant to be an average of all the prices in the market, including the deep discounts to big buyers.

Doctors have been steamed though, especially cancer docs who use anti-anemia medicines made by Amgen and Johnson & Johnson. They say that in order to get a good price on Amgen’s cancer drug Neulasta, they often need to sign up to buy a lot of Aranesp. J&J’s fought back with deep discounts on its own product and has even sued Amgen. As a result of all the rebates, the ASPs for both anemia drugs – and the Medicare reimbursement paid to doctors–are being pushed down.

The report that the proposal is based on gives this example: Drug A and Drug C (say, Aranesp and Neulasta) are bundled together and have a discount of $200,000 on sales of $1 million. If Drug A sells $600,000, under the new rules the drug maker would now have to put 60% of the discount toward that drug’s ASP.

In an interview with the Health Blog, Geoffrey Porges of Sanford Bernstein called the change “a shot on Amgen.”

The proposed change could make drug companies rethink their bundles. It could push down the reimbursement amounts for Aranesp, giving doctors potentially less incentive to buy Aranesp. That would be good news for doctors who say that the way Amgen is packaging its drugs is forcing them to make choices based on economics instead of clinical benefit.

An Amgen spokeswoman says the company is reviewing the impact of the proposal and intends to comment. A spokeswoman for J&J’s Ortho Biotech, which makes Procrit, says it’s reviewing the proposal and will be commenting to CMS during the comment period.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909