corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 10753

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Dyer C.
NICE's decision on dementia drugs was 'irrational', High Court is told
BMJ 2007 Jun 30; 334:(7608):1337
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/334/7608/1337-a


Full text:

The regulatory body that decides which treatments the NHS should pay for was accused of “irrational” decision making in the High Court this week for denying drugs to patients in the mild stage of Alzheimer’s disease.

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), which issues its guidance on the basis of cost benefit analyses, is facing its first legal challenge to a decision to restrict a drug’s availability on the NHS.

The unprecedented case was brought to the High Court in London this week by two drug companies and by the Alzheimer’s Society, representing patients and carers.

NICE’s guidance last year meant that nearly 100 000 patients a year in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland with mild Alzheimer’s disease were no longer entitled to certain drugs on the NHS. The drugs are the acetyl cholinesterase inhibitors donepezil (Aricept), rivastigmine (Exelon), and galantamine (Reminyl). Eisai, the Japanese manufacturer of . . .

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.