corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 10608

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Irwin T.
Pharma Outsourcing R&D To Free Up Marketing Dollars
Marketing Daily 2007 Jun 21
http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.san&s=62736&Nid=31597&p=448587


Full text:

PHARMA COMPANIES ARE OUTSOURCING MORE R&D to free up cash for marketing, according to a new study from Cutting Edge Information.

“Uniting R&D and Marketing for Integrated Early-Stage Market Preparation” is Cutting Edge Information’s latest study. The report reveals that pharmaceutical companies are looking to the biotech sector to outsource development of new drugs. In doing so, the company can free up resources to market drugs currently in their pipelines.

“I think there are two things driving this,” says Elio Evangelista, research team leader at the North Carolina-based business intelligence firm. “The first is more spending and more overall focus on marketing. With fewer blockbuster products available in companies’ portfolios, those brand teams are finding newer and more innovative ways to market their products.”

One of those methods is to work more closely with R&D to develop more competitive labels, Evangelista says. The more a company can accomplish in clinical testing during launch, the more competitive it can be on the market. So R&D begins to play a much larger role in product lifecycle management.

“The second factor driving this increased communication is, in part, the external pressure for companies to reinvest their profits in more R&D,” Evangelista tells Marketing Daily. “In doing so, R&D teams need to work with marketing teams more closely to begin developing products that the market will accept. It’s no use spending hundreds of millions of dollars developing a drug that will never reach the market. Therefore, working more closely with marketing teams to develop viable products will go a long way to reducing the costs of health care.”

The report, available at http://www.UnitingResearchAndMarketing.com, includes strategies and tactics from 15 top pharma companies including Pfizer, Novartis, Merck, and Sanofi-Aventis.

One profiled company is in favor of shrinking business unit departments and creating small internal teams to handle deals with small biotechs to outsource most of the early-stage pre-clinical work. The idea is based on the biotech industry’s capability to develop innovative products more quickly than slow-moving, large pharmaceutical companies.

The company invests almost as much in early-stage research as it would for an in-house compound, but it outsources the work to smaller, faster-moving biotechs, which assume some of the risk that the company would otherwise retain.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909