corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 10583

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Kontominas B.
Food firms accused of pushing toddler milk
Sydney Morning Herald 2007 Jun 9
http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/food-firms-accused-of-pushing-toddler-milk/2007/06/08/1181089328745.html


Full text:

FOOD and drug companies are using aggressive marketing tactics similar to those used in the tobacco industry to circumvent advertising bans on infant formulas and sell milk drinks to parents, a nutritionist has warned.

Pediatric nutritionists and medical experts say the marketing of milk formula to toddlers, including the tactic of handing out samples to pregnant women, should be banned.

The marketing techniques were criticised this week during a Sydney hearing of the parliamentary inquiry into the benefits of breastfeeding.

Under an agreement by the Manufacturers of Australian Infant Formula, companies may not advertise formula for children under 12 months as it has been shown to reduce breastfeeding rates. However, there are no restrictions on advertising toddler milk or follow-on formulas.

Professor Colin Binns, who helped develop pediatric and adolescent nutritional guidelines for the National Health and Medical Research Council, said formula companies were getting around the restrictions by using the same or similar trade names, such as “formula” and “gold”, in infant and toddler milks.

“It is a technique used by tobacco companies which use their brand name on clothing and other merchandise to capture the teen market,” he told the Herald.

While he does not oppose toddler milk or its marketing, he said he would “much prefer to see children drink a milk-based product than a fruit juice”.

The president of the Australian Lactation Consultants Association, Gwen Moody, said food should replace milk as the primary source of energy during a child’s second year. “Mothers buy the formula and they also give their child cow’s milk … so either the child doesn’t eat because they’re not hungry, or they do eat, which can lead to weight gain. It is very clever to develop a market for this age when a child should be eating solids.”

A Sydney pediatrician, Dr Patricia McVeagh, said children’s appetites naturally decreased at the toddler stage.

“Unfortunately the advertising preys on parents’ vulnerability,” she said. “Nutritionally there is no need for toddler milk in healthy kids, and it’s much better to have 600 millilitres of cow’s milk or a cow’s milk product like cheese or yoghurt.”

Mina Hornby knew she was feeding her son Pavle, 20 months, a healthy diet of fish, vegetables, meat and milk. However, conflicting advice and pressure to be a good mother prompted her to give him toddler formula before switching back to cow’s milk. Louise Duursma, a member of the Australian Breastfeeding Association, said new mothers were targeted at baby expos where toddler formula samples were given to pregnant women. “They are indirectly selling their formulas to newborn babies.”

The Infant Formula Manufacturers’ Association of Australia, which represents Heinz, Nutricia, Nestle and the pharmaceutical companies Wyeth and Bayer, denies that toddler milk affects breastfeeding rates.

Its executive director, Janet Carey, said the product was developed in Europe as a response to research showing that 30 per cent of young children were deficient in iron. “It really wasn’t developed as a cynical way to getting around marketing restrictions [of infant formula] in Australia,” she said.

She agreed with nutritionists that toddler milk was not necessary, “just like vitamin supplements aren’t necessary”, but it could supplement the diets of “fussy eaters”.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909