corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 10486

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Ou YJ.
A survey of pharmacists' recommendation in a unit dose drug distribution system
Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal 2002; 54:(6):449-455


Abstract:

This study was conducted for the purpose of evaluation of various pharmacists’ recommendation in a unit dose drug distribution system at the university hospital. The specific goal is to understand various categories of interventions by pharmacists on physician inpatients’ orders. The pharmacists’ activities on the inpatients’ drug profiles were examined and evaluated retrospectively. Data concerning more than two thousand recommendation from July 1 to December 31 of 2001 at Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital (KMUH) were collected and analyzed. The interventions was categorized into 13 drug-related-problems. The results showed (1) entry error, (2) the patient has a medical condition resulting from inappropriate drug combinations, (3) miscellaneous, (4) the patient has a medical condition resulting from failure to discontinue the original orders, (5) the patient has a medical condition resulting from inappropriate dosages were the top five recommendations. When the drug categories were concerned, the classes of the drug recommendations were (1) antimicrobial drugs, (2) digestive system drugs, (3) central nervous system drugs, (4) cardiovascular system drugs and (5) respiratory system drugs. The drugs that pharmacists used to provide recommendations were 1. GentamicinR (gentamicin), 2. SuwellR (aluminum hydroxide + magnesium hydroxide + simthicone) (3) CefamezinR (cefazolin), (4) Magnesium oxideR (magnesium oxide), and (5) PiprilR (piperacillin). The personnel contacted mostly by pharmacists were physicians. The percentage of the recommendations accepted by them (physicians, nurses, assistants) was 92.8%. The results of this study show that pharmacists provide a service that goes far beyond the simple distribution of medication. Providing the proper drug information to the appropriate persons, as a part of hospital pharmacy services that takes into account safety, efficiency, rationality and economics, is essential to maintaining the quality of drug therapy in hospital.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909