corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 10220

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Osterweil N.
APA: Most Bipolar Patients Start on Off-Label Antidepressants
MedPage Today 2007 May 24
http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/APAMeeting/tb2/5765


Full text:

Conference Report

SAN DIEGO, May 24 — Antidepressants are widely used to treat the depression in bipolar disorder, despite their lack of approval for the indication and limited evidence of efficacy and safety, investigators reported here.

A review of nationwide prescribing patterns of psychotropic drugs for patients with diagnosed bipolar disorder revealed that more than half received antidepressants as initial monotherapy, with anticonvulsant drugs coming in a distant second, reported Ross J. Baldessarini, M.D., of Harvard, and colleagues.

“Utilization rates for antidepressants were very high despite a lack of compelling evidence of their efficacy or safety in bipolar depression, and polytherapy came to dominate treatment by one year,” the investigators wrote in a poster presentation at the meeting of the American Psychiatric Association here.

The FDA has approved several antimanic and mood stabilizing agents for the treatment of depression associated with bipolar disorder. Antidepressants, although not approved for this indication, are increasingly being used off-label as monotherapy and in combination, the authors noted.

To get a snapshot of how specific drugs and combinations are being used to treat bipolar disorder, the investigators used a HIPAA-compliant, national health-plan claims database for the years 2000 through 2004 to identify patients with an International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision (ICD-9) diagnosis of bipolar disorder.

To be included in the study, all patients had to have continuous benefits, have at least one prescription filled for bipolar disease therapy in the study period, and to have been untreated in the six months before the index prescription was filled.

They identified a total of 7,567 patients with bipolar disorder, 57% men, 43% women, with a mean age of 35.5 ± 12.4 years. In all, 55.2% of patients had type I bipolar disorder, 14.5% had type II, and 30.3% had a disorder not otherwise specified.

The large majority of the patients (74.9%) had one initial prescription, while the remaining 36.1% had prescriptions for two or more mood-altering drugs.

The initial monotherapies, in rank from first to last, were:

Antidepressants: 56.1%
Anticonvulsants: 13.9%
Antipsychotics: 10.6%
Lithium: 5.7%

Among the patients receiving anticonvulsants, valproate (Depakote, Depakene) was prescribed for 10.2%, lamotrigine (Lamictal) for 2.9%, and carbamazepine (Carbetrol, Tegretol) for 0.8%.

Initial and overlapping combinations included: antidepressants in 9.9%, antipsychotics in 8.9%, anticonvulsants in 7.3%, lithium in 2.3%. The rank order for combinations was the same at one year, with 36.1% of patients still receiving monotherapy, 25.7% receiving two or more psychotropics, and 38.2% getting nothing.

Psychotropic prescriptions per patient averaged 1.29 at baseline, and 1.52 at one year. Among the 5,666 patients who initially filled just one prescription, 68.6% were for antidepressants, 14.6% were for anticonvulsants, 10.8% were for antipsychotics, and 6.0% were for lithium. The proportions were roughly the same for 2,732 patients who remained on monotherapy at one year.

Among 1,945 patients who were on combination therapy at one year, 83.4% were taking antidepressants, 58.2% antipsychotics, 56.3% anticonvulsants, and 23.6% were receiving lithium.

At one year, the largest proportion of patients, 39% were receiving no drug treatment for bipolar disorder.

“Combination therapy and no medication came to dominate treatment by one year,” the authors wrote. “Prevalent non-treatment at 12 months encourages development of better-tolerated mood-stabilizing treatments.”

The study was funded by Novartis, the Bruce J. Anderson Foundation, and the McLean Private Donors Research Fund. Dr. Baldessarini is a consultant to Novartis, and his co-authors are employees of either i3-Innovus, a market research firm, or Novartis.

Action points

Explain to patients who ask that drug therapy for depression associated with bipolar disorder may include mood stabilizers and/or antimanic agents.

This study was published as an abstract and presented orally at a conference. These data and conclusions should be considered to be preliminary as they have not yet been reviewed and published in a peer-reviewed publication.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909