corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 8520

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Lexchin J.
A comparison of new drug availability in Canada and the United States and potential therapeutic implications of differences.
Health Policy 2006 Dec; 79:(2-3):214-20
http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0168-8510(06)00003-0


Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Claims are made that new valuable drugs are not available in Canada at the time that they are marketed in the United States. This study uses a convenience sample of new drugs marketed in the United States and determines how many of these products are initially unavailable in Canada and their therapeutic value.

METHODS: Issues of the Canadian edition of The Medical Letter from May 12, 2003 to June 21, 2004 were hand searched for evaluations of new drugs and the following information was recorded: indication, availability in Canada and conclusions about therapeutic value. For drugs not available in Canada two clinical pharmacologists rated the therapeutic value of the products and the type of FDA review (standard or priority) was recorded. A database from the Therapeutic Products Directorate was searched to see if any of the drugs initially unavailable were subsequently marketed.

RESULTS: Thirty-two of 37 drugs were not available in Canada. Between 9 and 11 of these products were rated as offering moderate to significant therapeutic gains. Twelve of the 32 drugs eventually were marketed in Canada.

INTERPRETATION: Although the majority of new drugs marketed in the United States but not available in Canada do not offer any therapeutic advantage, between about a quarter and a third of may offer moderate to significant therapeutic gains. The reasons why these drugs are unavailable and how much their absence affects the treatment Canadians receive should be the subject of future research.

Keywords:
Publication Types: Comparative Study MeSH Terms: Canada Drug Approval* Humans Pharmaceutical Preparations/supply & distribution* Review Literature United States Substances: Pharmaceutical Preparations

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909