corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 8373

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Griffith WA, Cangemi RR.
Direct-to-consumer Rx ads? Drug firms see pluses, minuses
Drug Topics 1995? May 20; 129:60-61


Abstract:

To determine how pharmaceutical manufacturers feel about advertising prescriptions directly to consumers, a questionnaire was mailed to 88 senior marketing executives at drug companies all over the country. Responses were received from 55 companies representing 40% of the prescription sales. It was shown that about 24% of the respondents indicated that their firms are planning to advertise, while 33% were uncommitted. Some 43% stated that their firms are not planning to advertise to consumers. A majority of respondents (79%) believed that not all prescription drugs should be promoted to the public. About 80% of all respondents said that direct-to-consumer ads of prescription drugs would increase sales. On the debit side, a majority of respondents (50%) indicated that consumer advertising could result in increased exposure to product liability lawsuits. Most respondents favored the monitoring of prescription drugs. Finally, the majority of respondents did not believe that consumer advertising of Rx products would lead to higher health costs.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909