corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 8338

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Fahey M.
Guide to consumers' pharmaceutical purchasing behavior
Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy 1996 Sep-Oct; 2:489-490, 494, 498-499


Abstract:

To examine consumers’ purchasing decisions for prescription and nonprescription medications, a survey of 5000 consumers was conducted to determine their sources of advice about medications, their communications with prescribers about cost and impact on quality of life, their opinions about price equity of medications, the importance of the pharmacy benefit in health plans, and the role of advertising in purchasing decisions for nonprescription medications. Results revealed that Medicaid patients more often went to pharmacists for advice than to physicians. Those with traditional insurance and those in managed care plans also gathered information from multiple sources: 83% talked to the physician; 71% also consulted pharmacists. Survey data showed that only slightly more than one-half of patients reported having discussions with their physicians about both quality of life and cost considerations when a course of treatment was chosen. Approximately 60-70% of survey respondents who had insurance believe that the cost of prescription drugs is unfair. A majority (more than 70%) of all consumers considered the inclusion of a pharmacy benefit to be a very important criterion in their decision to purchase a health plan. One-half reported that they considered pharmaceutical advertisements as educational, helping them become more informed consumers. Forty-two percent said they would base their next purchase decision on such advertising.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.