corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 8177

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Mangino MH, Szajna JL, Ptachcinski R, Skledar SJ.
Role of a pharmacy technician in implementing a prescription assistance program for indigent and underinsured patients
ASHP Midyear Clinical Meeting 1998 Dec; 33:


Abstract:

Described is the role of a pharmacy technician in implementing a prescription assistance program for indigent and underinsured patients. The Pharmacy Assistance and Information on Reimbursement (PAIR) Program was developed as an institution cost recovery program and to provide cost effective drug acquisition for patients whose drug expenditures create a financial hardship. Technician responsibilities included defining program goals, identifying eligible patients, creating physician and patient databases, documenting request and receipt of drug; maintaining low cost formulary alternative listing for physicians and pharmacists; and monitoring program impact. To date, the program has netted $240,000 in recovered drugs and has served over 375 patients. Future plans include expansion of services to affiliate institutions and measuring impact on readmissions previously caused by noncompliance.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963