corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 6903

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Dunea G.
Fancy drugs for worried folks.
BMJ 1999 Aug 21; 319:(7208):525A


Abstract:

Mrs Boronowski, 67, went to Dr Jingle for nervous indigestion and multiple allergies, and left with a bunch of prescriptions: omeprazole ($4 (£2.50) a tablet); buspirone ($1.30 a tablet) for her nerves; loratidine ($2.20 a tablet) for her allergies; the newest hypnotic, zolpidem ($1.70 a tablet). She also takes atorvostatin ($3.60 a tablet), multivitamin B, yeast, ascorbic acid, vitamin E, and, for hypertension, losartan ($1.30 a tablet). Mrs Boronowski sent her pharmacist’s bill to her insurance company and immediately felt better. In future, if President Clinton has his way she will send her bill to Medicare. At present one third of Medicare recipients reportedly have no drug coverage. Clinton would like to provide full coverage for everybody. The pharmacy industry fears price controls will follow and argues that they will kill the golden research goose that has revolutionised modern therapeutics. Mrs Boronowski’s bill may drop by 20%, but Dr Jingle will continue to prescribe the newest and dearest drugs. Meanwhile Mr Suggs, who pumps gas for small wages, has a painful duodenal ulcer relieved only by omeprazole, which he has to buy himself because he has no insurance. His neighbour has had a kidney transplant and cannot afford antirejection drugs. But another neighbour has a “nervous condition” and a limp, takes cocaine, gets a bagful of free medicine from Medicaid (public aid) each month. If there ever was an ancient goddess of reason, she assuredly remains perched high on Mount Olympus and has not yet descended among the mortals.

Keywords:
*analysis/United States/Medicare drug coverage/Medicaid/price controls/parody/INFLUENCE OF PROMOTION: PRESCRIBING, DRUG USE

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963