corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 672

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

La Puma J, Stocking CB, Rhoades WD, Darling CM, Ferner RE, Neuberger J, VandenBurg M, Dews I, Tobias JS.
Financial ties as part of informed consent to postmarketing research. Attitudes of American doctors and patients
BMJ 1995 Jun 24; 310:1660-1661
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/310/6995/1660


Abstract:

Postmarketing research, often called phase IV trials, is intended to familiarise doctors and patients with newly approved drugs. La Puma and colleagues, in Chicago, studied doctors’ and patients’ attitudes to whether doctors should receive payment for taking part in such research. We asked for commentaries on their findings from four ethical experts, who put the study in a British context, present the views of patients, and examine some methodological assumptions.

Keywords:
*analytic survey United States United Kingdom patients drug company sponsored research reimbursement to doctors ETHICAL ISSUES IN PROMOTION: PAYMENTS IN STUDIES SPONSORSHIP: RESEARCH

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend