corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 670

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

La Puma J.
Drug promotion.
N Engl J Med 1995 Apr 13; 332:(15):1031

Keywords:
*letter to the editor *analytic survey United States seeding studies reimbursement to doctors drug company sponsored research ETHICAL ISSUES IN PROMOTION: PAYMENTS IN STUDIES PROMOTION DISGUISED: CLINICAL TRIALS


Notes:

Most doctors who responded to a survey found it acceptable to be paid to be involved in seeding studies and most patients did not find it acceptable. Most physicians and patients thought some physicians might be influenced to enroll patients just for the fee.

Comment on:
N Engl J Med. 1994 Nov 17;331(20):1350-3.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend