corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 6627

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Bero LA, Rennie D.
Influences on the quality of published drug studies.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1996 Spr; 12:(2):209-37


Abstract:

To practice evidence-based medicine, physicians need data on clinical effectiveness, toxicity, convenience and cost of new drugs compared with available alternatives. We give examples of published drug studies that are defective, sometimes because pharmaceutical industry funding has affected their content and quality. We make recommendations on how to avoid these defects.

Keywords:
*systematic review/drug company sponsored research/publication bias/randomized controlled trials, evaluation of/INFLUENCE OF PROMOTION: OUTCOME OF CLINICAL TRIALS/INFLUENCE OF PROMOTION: PUBLICATION/PROMOTION DISGUISED: CLINICAL TRIALS/SPONSORSHIP: RESEARCH Data Interpretation, Statistical Drug Evaluation/economics Drug Evaluation/standards* Drug Industry Publishing/standards Research Design/standards Research Support

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend