corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 652

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Taylor SD, Sullivan DL, Birdwell SW.
A comparative analysis of prescription drug advertising before and after patent expiration
J Pharm Mark Manage 1995; 9:(4):3-18

Keywords:
*analytic survey United States journal advertisements quality of information images in ads patent status IMAGES IN PROMOTION: EMOTIONAL APPEAL IMAGES IN PROMOTION: SCIENTIFIC APPEAL


Notes:

In this study, a content analysis was used to evaluate advertisements of two drug products before patent expiration and after patent expiration. Advertisements were evaluated for information content, emotional appeals and rational appeals. The results showed differences in the frequency of use of types of information content, rational appeals adn emotional appeals based on the status of patent protection for the 375 drug product advertisements reviewed.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963