corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 4050

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Cockerill R.
Report on the 1989 survey of the dispensing practices and attitudes toward prescription drugs of Ontario pharmacists
1990;


Abstract:

Pharmacists report relatively little contact with sales representatives. The majority place few, if any, restrictions on visits by these people and they indicate that they have been offered very few benefits by them. The most important sources of information for pharmacists are the Compendium of Pharmaceuticals and Specialties, journal articles and drug information centres. Pharmaceutical company representatives and ads and promotional literature are ranked as least important, but even with these sources, approximately a quarter of the pharmacists claimed they are an important, or very important source of information. Pharmacists licensed after 1980 are more likely to rely on journal articles, drug information centres and consultations with prescribers and pharmacists for their drug information. Only about half of the pharmacists feel that there is a potential conflict of interest in pharmacists accepting benefits from pharmaceutical companies, and this percent is significantly lower for those licensed after 1980. Only about half agree that the Ontario College of Pharmacists should set and enforce guidelines for conflict of interest concerning benefits from pharmaceutical companies. Pharmacists are supportive of regulations requiring drug companies to include information about contraindications, side-effects and costs in their advertisements.

Keywords:
*analytic survey/Canada/pharmacies and pharmacists/source of information/value of promotion/sales representatives/conflict of interest/gift giving/regulation of promotion/guidelines, discussion of/quality of information/safety & risk information/ATTITUDES REGARDING PROMOTION: HEALTH PROFESSION STUDENTS/ETHICAL ISSUES IN PROMOTION: GIFT GIVING/PROMOTION AS A SOURCE OF INFORMATION: PHARMACISTS/PROMOTIONAL TECHNIQUES: DETAILING/PROMOTIONAL TECHNIQUES: JOURNAL ADVERTISEMENTS/REGULATION, CODES, GUIDELINES: HEALTH PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








As an advertising man, I can assure you that advertising which does not work does not continue to run. If experience did not show beyond doubt that the great majority of doctors are splendidly responsive to current [prescription drug] advertising, new techniques would be devised in short order. And if, indeed, candor, accuracy, scientific completeness, and a permanent ban on cartoons came to be essential for the successful promotion of [prescription] drugs, advertising would have no choice but to comply.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963