corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 33

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Wilkes MS, Hoffman JR.
An innovative approach to educating medical students about pharmaceutical promotion.
Acad Med 2001 Dec; 76:(12):1271-1277
http://www.academicmedicine.org/cgi/content/full/76/12/1271


Abstract:

Prescription drugs comprise approximately 9% of the total cost of health care in the United States. The manner in which doctors obtain information about new and changing pharmaceuticals obviously has the potential to have a profound impact on health care costs, pharmaceutical companies’ profits, and the quality of health care. Patterns learned in medical school undoubtedly influence physicians’ future behaviors. The authors describe an educational program, in which university pharmacists portrayed pharmaceutical company representatives to model a promotional presentation, that they designed to generate critical thinking among third-year medical students regarding the influence of pharmaceutical representatives on the prescribing practices of physicians. The authors also provide information suggesting that the program increased the uncertainty many students felt about the accuracy and ethics of standard drug “detailing.” Compared to questionnaire responses that students provided before the exercise, the attitudes they expressed in course assessments completed 12 weeks after the session revealed much more uncertainty about the ethics and value of interactions with drug reps, and the number who stated that they wanted to interact with drug reps
during their residency fell from 86% to 61%. Although its long-term impact is unknown, this is potentially a valuable approach for inoculating medical students against some of the worst potential consequences of biased drug detailing presentations.

Keywords:
*educational intervention *cohort study United States attitude toward promotion sales representatives quality of information students ATTITUDES REGARDING PROMOTION: HEALTH PROFESSION STUDENTS EDUCATING ABOUT PROMOTION: HEALTH PROFESSION STUDENTS PROMOTION AS A SOURCE OF INFORMATION: HEALTH PROFESSION STUDENTS


Notes:

Methodologic note: The long term effects of this intervention are not known. In the absence of a control group means that other factors may also have influenced the change in attitudes. There is a possibility of a social acceptability bias in the answers to the questionnaire after the intervention.
ProCite field5: Educational intervention/cohort study

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








What these howls of outrage and hurt amount to is that the medical profession is distressed to find its high opinion of itself not shared by writers of [prescription] drug advertising. It would be a great step forward if doctors stopped bemoaning this attack on their professional maturity and began recognizing how thoroughly justified it is.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963