corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 2977

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Eastman M.
The day the detail man talked
American Pharmacy 1978; 18:(11):592


Abstract:

Charles Brannan, former Hoffman-La Roche detain man, testified to the Senate Select Committee on Narcotics Abuse and Control about pressure (‘the velvet hammer’) allegedly placed on him by a superior to supersell Valium to physicians and pharmacists. Brannan, a plaintiff in a class action against HLR, quit on disability in 1976. He produced a company document stressing Valium’s versatility and commercial importance and asking for ‘commitment to Valium on every call’. In the hearing room was a large display of journal ads for Valium and other mood alterers. Many depicted women or elderly people. Brannan reported being expected to see six doctors daily, plus two hospitals and three pharmacists. He reported that 1975 Valium sales were $285 million, compared with $61 million in 1971. Total Librium and Valium sales in 1975 were $437 million, compared with $600 million total company sales. Irwin Lerner, HLR group vice president, said Roche was committed to providing accurate information to health professionals and full compliance with regulations governing such activities. Sue Boe, Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association assistant vice president for consumer affairs, said the more than doubling of anti-anxiety drug prescriptions since 1964 did not stem from overpromotion, but was largely due to maintenance of mentally ill outpatients. She cited statistics showing that by 1980 there will be a two-thirds reduction in hospitalized mental patients if the decline continues. Boe defended detailmen and journal ads, arguing that physicians do not make decisions based solely on their advocacy, and that patients benefit from advertising.

Keywords:
*news story/United States/

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909