Healthy Skepticism Library item: 2243
Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.
Publication type: Journal Article
Loke TW, Koh FC, Ward JE.
Pharmaceutical advertisement claims in Australian medical publications.
Med J Aust 2002 Sep 16; 177:(6):291-3
http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/177_06_160902/lok10004_fm.html
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To determine the quality of claims in advertisements published in Australian medical publications, describe how benefits and harms are presented, and examine the level of underpinning evidence. DESIGN AND SETTING: Audit of a consecutive three-month sample of advertisements appearing in six popular Australian medical publications. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of advertisements with quantitative information; proportion of claims conveying clinical outcomes; where retrievable, level of underpinning evidence. RESULTS: Of 1504 claims, 855 could be substantiated quantitatively. Of these, 45% were supported by compelling evidence (randomised controlled trials or better). Of 13 claims explicitly reporting quantitative outcomes, none provided the absolute risk reduction or the number needed to treat. CONCLUSIONS: Our audit invites greater diligence by pharmaceutical companies in substantiating their claims and greater vigilance among clinicians when reading them.
Keywords:
Advertising*
Australia
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Deception
Disclosure*
Drug Evaluation/statistics & numerical data*
Drug Industry*
Evidence-Based Medicine
Humans
Periodicals
Risk
Treatment Outcome
content analysis
Australia
journal advertisements
evidence
absolute risk reduction
number needed to treat
EVALUATION OF PROMOTION: JOURNAL ADVERTISEMENTS
PROMOTIONAL TECHNIQUES: JOURNAL ADVERTISEMENTS
