corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 20370

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Bradley CP
Factors which influence the decision whether or not to prescribe: the dilemma facing general practitioners
BMJ 1992 Nov; 42:454-458
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1372266/


Abstract:

In this study of the influences affecting general practitioners’ decisions whether or not to prescribe, 69 principals and five trainees in general practice were asked about the factors that made these decisions difficult for them and the circumstances in which the decision caused them to feel uncomfortable. Discomfort was reported most frequently in prescribing for respiratory disease, psychiatric conditions and skin problems, though the range of problems mentioned was wide. The range of drugs for which the decision of whether or not to prescribe was difficult was also wide but psychotropic drugs, antibiotics, drugs acting on the cardiovascular system and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were most often mentioned. Patient factors said to be important included age, ethnicity, social class and education, the doctor’s prior knowledge of the patient, the doctor’s feeling towards the patient, communication problems, and the doctor’s desire to try to preserve the doctor-patient relationship. Doctor specific factors included concerns about drugs, factors relating to doctors’ role perception and expectations of themselves, uncertainty, peer influences, logistic factors, and the experience of medical or therapeutic misadventures. The results of this study support earlier work on the influence of social factors on prescribing decisions and show that this influence affects the entire range of clinical problems. The results also reveal the importance of logistic factors. The overriding concern of doctors to preserve the doctor-patient relationship and the range of attitudes, perceptions and experiences of doctors that have a bearing on the decision to prescribe begin to explain the apparent irrationality of some general practitioner prescribing.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909