corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 12214

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

GSK says pharma must become more transparent
PMLive.com 2007 Dec 16
http://www.pmlive.com/index.cfm?showArticle=1&ArticleID=6360


Full text:

In an interview with online independent publisher Ethical Corporation, GSK vice-president for corporate communications Duncan Learmouth has said that pharma needs to become more transparent in its dealings in order to regain the public trust.

In the interview, Learmouth says that pharma finds it difficult to explain its work to the public. He added that big pharma was too often associated with big risks, such as health scares.

“There’s a danger in the media overplaying the risk side without balancing it with the benefit, and oversimplifying what is a very complicated situation of giving a drug to someone,” warned Learmouth.

2007 has been GSK’s “annus horribilis”. The firm’s share price fell to a two-year low in May after its diabetes treatment Avandia (roseglitazone) was linked to increased risks of heart attacks. Sales have fallen 50 per cent in the US and 40 per cent worldwide.

In November, the FDA placed a “black box” warning on the drug, but did not ban it. The decision backed up GSK’s claim that the original study linking Avandia to a 43 per cent increase in risk of heart attacks was misleading. The company continues to say that “meta-analysis”, looking at a large body of historical clinical data, has found no clear evidence of a link.

Learmouth told Ethical Corporation that pharma will become “ever more transparent”. Two years ago GSK decided to publish data on clinical trials online. The decision came after damaging claims that it had concealed clinical trial results from the general public in the case of anti-depressant Seroxat for use in teenagers.

He added that it was wrong to judge the case by today’s standards of corporate transparency: “It was not that there was some conspiracy to hide this information, it was just never done.”

GSK has recognised the need for much stronger policies on using ghostwriters in preparing end of trial papers. The old practice of using PR agencies to write papers today was no longer enough, explained Learmouth.

“These days a report’s lead author, a doctor, must have written the most significant part of a paper. GSK employees and other outsiders involved must also be named in the paper, and their affiliation noted,” he stressed.

Learmouth disagreed with critics who say that Big Pharma is finished because of a lack of new treatments in the pipeline. “Because the risk is high and probability is low, chance plays a big part in whether a company can discover a new class of drugs. You have to be a certain size to play the odds of that.”

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909