corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 12180

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Baertlein L.
Merck, Schering-Plough cholesterol trial faces probe
Reuters 2007 Dec 11
http://www.reuters.com/article/health-SP/idUSN1137519320071212?rpc=401&pageNumber=1&virtualBrandChannel=0


Full text:

Schering-Plough and Merck & Co are being investigated by U.S. lawmakers on allegations that the drugmakers are withholding data from a study that may change how doctors treat high cholesterol.

In a letter dated Dec. 11 and emailed to journalists, Rep. John Dingell, Chairman of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and Rep. Bart Stupak, Chairman of the Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee, requested information on the delayed release of data from their ENHANCE trial concluded in April 2006.

“We are aware of the letter, but have not yet officially received it, so we cannot offer a comment at this time,” said a Schering-Plough spokesman.

No one at Merck was immediately available for comment.

The ENHANCE trial compared the effectiveness of Vytorin — a product of Schering-Plough and Merck in partnership — with Merck’s Zocor in treating patients with a genetic predisposition to dangerously high cholesterol levels.

Vytorin combines the active ingredients from Zocor and Zetia — also from Schering-Plough and Merck in partnership — into a single pill.

The patent on Zocor has expired, and economic research firm Global Insight said in November the two groups hoped to show that Vytorin is superior to Zocor, also known as simvastatin, in a bid to fend off competition from makers of generic simvastatin.

Cardiologists have been clamoring for full results from the ENHANCE trial, which involved some of the industry’s best-selling cholesterol-lowering drugs.

In recent years, drug companies have vowed to promptly deliver clinical trial findings after being chastised for failing to disclose negative trial results.

In the letter, Schering-Plough CEO Fred Hassan and Merck CEO Richard Clark were asked to make the study’s principal investigator and corporate officials available for interviews with committee staff.

Dingell and Stupak also raised concern that the companies changed the trial’s primary endpoint — its main objective.

Merck and Schering-Plough said in a Nov. 20 press release they changed the primary endpoint on the recommendation of an independent panel of clinical and biostatistical experts.

The companies also said it has taken longer than expected to examine artery scans collected during the trial, but they plan to present ENHANCE data at the American College of Cardiology conference in March.

On Tuesday, Schering-Plough posted updated ENHANCE trial information on its Web site. It said researchers now plan to present both the original endpoint and the newer endpoint at the college.

The company also said that as of Dec. 11, neither the company nor the investigators knew the results of the trial.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909