corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 12110

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Negative vaccination info popular on YouTube: study
CBC News 2007 Dec 5
http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2007/12/05/vacciantion-study.html


Full text:

Negative information about vaccinations shown on the popular video website YouTube received more stars and more views than positive information, finds a new study conducted by researchers at York University and the University of Toronto.

YouTube is a video-streaming site that lets users share their videos with Internet viewers.

Researchers examined 153 YouTube videos dealing with vaccinations and immunizations to see whether they were more negative or positive in their stance and to see how viewers responded to them.

According to the study, published in the Dec. 5 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, many health care professionals have expressed concern about what they consider to be erroneous health information on Internet sites.

The researchers discovered that 48 per cent of the videos were positive, 32 per cent were negative and 20 per cent were ambiguous. They found that negative videos were more likely to be rated by viewers and to receive more views. On the other hand, public service announcements received the lowest ratings and fewest views.

They also found that viewers were most likely to debate childhood vaccines, which accounted for 25 per cent of the topics in discussion forums that accompany YouTube videos. The HPV vaccine, which protects against cervical cancer, accounted for 24 per cent of all online discussions.

“Clinicians therefore need to be aware of Internet video-sharing sites and should be prepared to respond to patients who obtain their health information from these sources,” the authors suggest.

They add that health professionals should consider using the YouTube site to spread accurate health messages.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.