Subscription payments are our core funding source so Paid Subscribers and Members are essential for ensuring that Healthy Skepticism Inc continues. We are a low budget organisation so even small financial contributions make a big difference.
You can support Healthy Skepticism with a subscription payment without being a member. Paying a membership fee is optional for students and pensioners in any country and anyone who doesn't live in a
high income country.
For membership inquiries please contact .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
We treat all members equally regardless of how much they pay. We trust you to decide how much money and/or time you can
contribute. Please take the following cost estimates into account. Our prices are in Australian $ (AUD).
AUD$ 500.00 (approximately USD $ 8) would enable us to do more than we currently have the resources to do.
AUD$ 250.00 (approximately USD $ 8) covers our average costs per member.
AUD$ 100.00 (approximately USD $ 8) covers our basic average costs per member for our website and other infrastructure, not including work done with donated time.
AUD$ 50.00 (approximately USD $ 8) covers our average additional costs for an additional member plus a free member in a lower income country.
AUD$ 25.00 (approximately USD $ 8) covers our average additional costs for an additional member.
Please log in otherwise the payment links do not work.
Below is a list of high income countries as classified by the World Bank. If you don't live in one of these countries then Healthy Skepticism membership is free. Click on the flag below to see that our prices in that country's currency displayed above.
Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.
The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963